Library · Machine learning & AI
What Deep Learning & Pretraining got wrong, from 17 theses
Summary written by a model from the records below: The evaluated thesis records demonstrate that deep learning and pretrained language models frequently face challenges with small sample overfitting, domain transfer, and time series forecasting. At the same time, simpler classical baselines often match or outperform complex neural networks, while shallow feature representations struggle on intricate spatial and semantic tasks. These records come from graduate theses, 2021 to 2025, each labeled with its degree where the repository states it, and each links to its thesis. They were extracted by language models reading the full text, so treat each as a lead to read, not a verdict.
Plus 4 problems the authors left open, listed at the end.
Failure modes, by theses reporting them
Select a mode to jump to its records.
Deep learning models risk severe overfitting in small sample regimes
Researchers rejected deep neural networks across behavioral, biomedical, chemometric, and EEG datasets due to high risks of overfitting and poor generalizability. These domains featured small sample counts and high collinearity that could not satisfy the heavy data demands of deep learning architectures.
Considered and rejected
Considered and rejected: Rejected using complex deep learning techniques without multi-task framing on small-sample behavioral datasets due to severe overfitting and poor generalizability.
Towards Human-Centered Behavioral Sensing for Student Support · University of Washington · PhD
Considered and rejected
Considered and rejected: Rejected Deep Learning (DL) models due to high risk of overfitting on small biomedical sample sizes, computational overhead, and lack of interpretability.
Machine learning prediction of atezolizumab treatment response in metastatic urothelial carcinoma using gene expression and clinical data · Imperial · PhD
Considered and rejected
Considered and rejected: Rejected OpenNN and deep learning frameworks (Keras/TensorFlow) due to narrow focus on neural networks and excessive data requirements for small tabular data
Fatigue Monitoring System · SUPSI
Considered and rejected
Considered and rejected: Rejected deep learning approaches due to limited training data and high susceptibility to overfitting in small EEG sample regimes.
Instrumentation for daily-life brain-computer interfaces · Politecnico di Torino · PhD
Considered and rejected
Considered and rejected: Deep learning / ANN models were deprioritized over PLS/SVM due to high chemometric collinearity and small sample size ('small n, large p' regime) risking overfitting without massive datasets.
Sensor Approaches for the Non-Destructive Assessment of Food Safety and Authenticity · Cranfield · PhD
Simpler statistical models and classical baselines outperform deep architectures
Classical approaches such as Random Forest, logistic regression, and linear interpolation matched or exceeded deep learning performance. Practitioners favored these baselines because they offered simpler implementations, reduced false positives, faster explainability, and superior whole-image accuracy.
Tried and failed
deep learning on raw signals and scalograms applied to arterial Doppler waveform classification. Outcome: worse than baseline. Reason: deep models underperformed handcrafted feature-based logistic regression classifier
Testing for peripheral arterial disease in diabetes · Imperial · PhD
Considered and rejected
Considered and rejected: Rejected using deep learning architecture over Random Forest classifier because Random Forest was simpler and reduced false positives by 50% vs 35% for DNN.
Molecular simulation on two-dimensional nanoporous material for energy-efficient separation · EPFL · PhD
Lost to a baseline
Linear and optical flow interpolation yielded lower whole-image MSE than deep learning methods (R2UNet/proposed) because the latter deprioritized background non-ROI pixels.
Controllable synthetic algorithms and evaluations for annotated clinical image synthesis · Imperial · PhD
Pretrained language models encounter overfitting and degradation on downstream text tasks
Pretrained transformer models and their embeddings exhibited overfitting, fluctuating validation loss, or degraded classification metrics across several text tasks. Specifically, larger models underperformed lightweight variants, domain-adapted embeddings lagged behind general-domain baselines, and raw dialogue text reduced sentiment recall.
Tried and failed
fine-tuning pretrained transformer for continuous regression applied to short text evaluation scores. Outcome: overfit. Reason: validation loss fluctuated in later epochs, failing to generalize to unseen data
Enhancing Sensory Panel Decision-Making: A GenAI Approach Using RoBERTa to Quantify Free-Form Comments · Cornell · Master's
Tried and failed
larger pretrained transformer embeddings applied to fine-grained text classification. Outcome: worse than baseline. Reason: DistilBERT outperformed full BERT representations across all tested downstream classifiers.
Spatiotemporal Event Forecasting and Analysis with Ubiquitous Urban Sensors · Virginia Tech · Doctorate
Tried and failed
Domain-specific pretrained language model embeddings applied to Extractive text summarization. Outcome: worse than baseline. Reason: Domain-adapted BERT underperformed general domain BERT and GPT-2 on extractive summarization metrics
Computational acquisition of knowledge in small-data environments: a case study in the field of energetics · Imperial · PhD
Tried and failed
pretrained language model embeddings on raw text applied to chatbot text sentiment classification. Outcome: worse than baseline. Reason: raw chatbot-generated text representations degraded classification recall compared to customer text alone
Three essays on strategic digital initiatives in modern organizations · Georgia Tech · PhD
Traditional shallow baselines fail to capture complex spatial or semantic representations
Classical baselines such as random forests, TF-IDF representations, and shallow word embeddings proved inadequate for complex predictive tasks. These shallow methods failed to capture intricate spatial gradients and subtle rhetorical or contextual information handled better by deep learning and pretrained transformers.
Tried and failed
random forest regression for field variable surrogate applied to turbulent flow field prediction. Outcome: worse than baseline. Reason: random forest failed to capture complex spatial gradients compared to deep learning framework
Multifidelity machine learning methods for flow field prediction and aerodynamic shape optimization · Iowa State · PhD
Tried and failed
Logistic regression on TF-IDF features applied to text classification of discourse tone. Outcome: worse than baseline. Reason: TF-IDF bag-of-words failed to capture subtle stylistic and rhetorical context compared to pretrained transformers
Modeling Legal Constructs · Cornell · PhD
Tried and failed
shallow word embedding text classification applied to intent classification. Outcome: worse than baseline. Reason: underperformed compared to pretrained contextual language models
Empathetic Conversational Agents for Distress Support · EPFL · PhD
Pretrained language models face forecasting degradation and temporal leakage in time series tasks
Applying language models to time series and historical financial data caused performance degradation across forecasting horizons compared to standard deep architectures. Additionally, off-the-shelf models were rejected due to severe temporal pretraining leakage when forecasting historical financial data.
Tried and failed
domain fine-tuned zero-shot language model applied to time series forecasting. Outcome: worse than baseline. Reason: exhibited performance degradation across all horizons and metrics compared to standard deep learning models
Deep Learning Methods for Built Environment Operational Management · Virginia Tech · Doctorate
Considered and rejected
Considered and rejected: Rejected off-the-shelf contemporary LLMs for historical financial forecasting due to severe temporal pretraining leakage.
Essays in Finance, Technology, and Behavior · Harvard · PhD
Left open by the authors
Problems the authors named and did not get to.
Left open
Tune hyperparameters and architectures for deep learning emergency department arrival forecasting models across 1h to 48h horizons. Blocker: Requires the emergency department arrival dataset used in the thesis, which is likely private hospital data.
Predicting the Unpredictable: Comparing Statistical Forecasting and Deep Learning Models for Forecasting Emergency Department Arrivals · Harvard · Master's
Left open
Apply transfer learning and transformer architectures to improve generalization of deep learning models across diverse seismic datasets. Blocker: The objective is a broad research direction lacking specific datasets, target tasks, or evaluation metrics.
Improving accuracy and efficiency of seismic data analysis using deep learning · UT Austin · PhD
Left open
Evaluate deep learning architectures against shallow models for GHG and odour emissions from biological nutrient removal wastewater data. Blocker: Lacks access to the specific cold-region wastewater treatment plant field and laboratory monitoring dataset.
ESTIMATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS AND ODOUR EMISSIONS FROM COLD REGION MUNICIPAL BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES · Saskatchewan · PhD
Left open
Develop tabular deep learning architectures or evaluate feature selection across wider combinations of cardinality and coefficient of variation. Blocker: None
Data Value Analytics for Feature Selection and Dataset Retrieval · University College Dublin · PhD
Who has worked on this
Authors of the public theses cited on this page, most-cited first.
- Mossoun Franck Malick Jaurès Ebiele · University College Dublin · PhD · 2026
Data Value Analytics for Feature Selection and Dataset Retrieval - Rosamond Thalken · Cornell · PhD · 2025
Modeling Legal Constructs - Suproteem Kumar Sarkar · Harvard · PhD · 2025
Essays in Finance, Technology, and Behavior - Han Zhang · University of Washington · PhD · 2025
Towards Human-Centered Behavioral Sensing for Student Support - Samuel Heffer · Cranfield · PhD · 2025
Sensor Approaches for the Non-Destructive Assessment of Food Safety and Authenticity - Yueyan Gu · Virginia Tech · Doctorate · 2025
Deep Learning Methods for Built Environment Operational Management - Chayanit Piyawajanusorn · Imperial · PhD · 2024
Machine learning prediction of atezolizumab treatment response in metastatic urothelial carcinoma using gene expression and clinical data - Bhaavin Gandhi · Cornell · Master's · 2024
Enhancing Sensory Panel Decision-Making: A GenAI Approach Using RoBERTa to Quantify Free-Form Comments - Xiaodan Xing · Imperial · PhD · 2024
Controllable synthetic algorithms and evaluations for annotated clinical image synthesis - Mohammad Tohidivahdat · EPFL · PhD · 2023
Molecular simulation on two-dimensional nanoporous material for energy-efficient separation - Kalpani Anuradha Welivita · EPFL · PhD · 2023
Empathetic Conversational Agents for Distress Support - Sinead O'Brien · Imperial · PhD · 2022
Computational acquisition of knowledge in small-data environments: a case study in the field of energetics
Checking a claim in this area?
We can run the same search on any method or claim. If nothing turns up, we will say so, and that proves nothing on its own.